Week 4 Review

Credits to @suika
Image Link

 Week 4 Plan:
1. Continue doing research about how to do unit testing or some sort of testing on Android Studio.
2. If research successful do a quick test and make a blog post about it.
3. Finish Chapter 3 Exercises.
4. Each member must do a commit and push to the team's repository on GitHub of the exercises.
5. Get ready for Partial 1 Exam.

Week 4 Review:
1. We talked to Guillermo Rivas who is the Mobile Apps profesor and he told us that it is possible to integrate unit testing to Android Studio with Junit since we are using Java but that he didn't know how to get that environment working. So we did some research about getting that set up and here's a very useful guide that we found:
Build Local Unit Tests

2. We ended un trying to import Junit but it kept displaying an error of versioning, so we're going install again Android Studio but with an extension pack that includes Junit.

3. Those are done and there up on the teams repo.

4. We didi the exercises as a team but some of the exercises didn't need code so Valentin couldn't make a push and commit to the repo.

5. Read the Chapter 1 and 3 Again.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapters 6.1 & 6.2

Image
Credits to @4vid Image Link 1. What two properties must be satisfied for an input domain to be properly partitioned?  Completeness: The partition must cover all of the domain. Disjoint: blocks should not overlap 2. What is an Input Domain Model (IDM)? Two Approaches to Input Domain Modeling: A. Interface-based approach. 􏰀 Develop characteristics directly from individual input parameters. 􏰀 Just use properties of the domains without considering the actual function under test. B. Functionality-based approach 􏰀 Develop characteristics from a behavioral view of the program under test. 􏰀 Use your understanding of what the system should do. 3. What gives more tests, each choice coverage or pair-wise coverage? Each Choice Coverage (ECC) states that one value from each block for each characteristic must be used in at least one test case. For example, for partitions [A, B] [1, 2] we can get [A, A], [B, B], [1, 1] and [2, 2] which are clearly redundan...
Read more

Final Exam Questions

1. Software fault: static error in the code. Software error: internal, not a normal behavior of the program due to a fault. Software failure: external, visible failure of the program. That it doesn't work basically. 2. Beizer discussed the goals of testing in terms of the “test process maturity levels” of an organization, where the levels are characterized by the testers’ goals. Level 0: Testing and debugging are the same. (Worst level) Level 1: Testing is only to find that your code doesn't work. Level 2: Get defensive or make an issue personal with testers because they broke your code. Level 3: Understand the job of a tester and take feedback as constructive criticism. Level 4: Become an expert software tester and make extreme good quality software. Work in harmony with testers. 3. Static Code Analysis is usually performed as part of a Code Review (also known as white-box testing). is a method of debugging by examining source code before a program is run . It’s done by ana...
Read more

Course evaluation

Image
Credits to @rossf Image Link ECOA Evidence  I've been Ken Bauer's student for almost four years in several different courses, and his teaching method has always been a breath of fresh air. From flip learning to almost conventional teaching (since you grade your own exam) he's not afraid to make changes and give students the chance to explore self learning and to take responsibility on when and how they learn the content of the course. This is a skill that is very important acquire and that is needed on a daily basis in every job in the tech field. Personally i enjoyed the Software Quality and Testing course. There are many students that might not like this method of teaching applied on this course because it requires them to take responsibilities on their own learning and some students can't handle this type of control over their own learning. No negative feedback for this course, only that maybe some classes should be online.
Read more